<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for InfoMatters</title>
	<link>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog</link>
	<description>Applying a Third Force to the Architecture of Information</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on NexD Journal on IA and iSchools by Seroquel xr.</title>
		<link>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/57#comment-57132</link>
		<dc:creator>Seroquel xr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/57#comment-57132</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Seroquel xr....&lt;/strong&gt;

Seroquel xr....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Seroquel xr&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Seroquel xr&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Roy Mersky - the law west of everywhere by adillon</title>
		<link>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/97#comment-41743</link>
		<dc:creator>adillon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/97#comment-41743</guid>
		<description>Addendum - Roy died peacefully Tuesday evening, May 6th, just after I posted this message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Addendum - Roy died peacefully Tuesday evening, May 6th, just after I posted this message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLIR workshop on Future of Academic Libraries by adillon</title>
		<link>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/88#comment-39230</link>
		<dc:creator>adillon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/88#comment-39230</guid>
		<description>the full papers can be found at: http://www.clir.org/activities/registration/08R21.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the full papers can be found at: <a href="http://www.clir.org/activities/registration/08R21.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.clir.org/activities/registration/08R21.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLIR workshop on Future of Academic Libraries by CLIR workshop on Future of Academic Libraries &#171; University of Melbourne Library Intelligencer</title>
		<link>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/88#comment-33890</link>
		<dc:creator>CLIR workshop on Future of Academic Libraries &#171; University of Melbourne Library Intelligencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/88#comment-33890</guid>
		<description>[...] CLIR workshop on Future of Academic&#160;Libraries  Posted on March 3, 2008 by lilyheart   http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/88 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] CLIR workshop on Future of Academic&nbsp;Libraries  Posted on March 3, 2008 by lilyheart   <a href="http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/88" rel="nofollow">http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/88</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The poverty of user-centered design by chad</title>
		<link>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/29#comment-33258</link>
		<dc:creator>chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/29#comment-33258</guid>
		<description>From Chad:

I wholeheartedly agree that the term user-centered (user-centric, ugh) is reaching buzzword status. It's becoming a feel-good word managers can throw around to gain credibility. I also agree that its practice is somewhat… "impoverished." But this impoverishment is not due to the UCD methods themselves, or even the skill of those employing UCD (usually). In my experience, the problem is one of stakeholder expectations about the amount of research UCD involvement required to ship a good product.

In my experience, most stakeholders understand that good design requires some contact with real users, but there are always pressures to deliver products more rapidly and more cheaply. I like the old adage, of FAST, CHEAP, GOOD – pick two, you can't have all three. I have seen UCD failures occur most frequently because the design team was not able to sell the stakeholders on performing adequate research to inform the design. In this scenario, some UCD is done, but not enough and so assumptions and guesses are made and the resulting design suffers, not because of UCD, but because of the lack of it. Meanwhile, the stakeholders will of course talk up how their product was usability tested, and what a difference it made, further watering down the notion of UCD.

It is up to us as designers and UCD practitioners to battle this – to make the case for more complete and holistic UCD activities in our projects and to take ownership of the whole user experience, not just the "usability" aspect. During the last couple of years, I have seen consideration of the "whole experience" really catching on. I try to think of my role as helping to make a product usable, useful, and desirable and I structure my work towards those ends. I harp on this "trinity" of design endlessly, and after awhile, people catch on. This approach can open doors to doing the kind of user research and UCD needed to gain those insights that lead to great products. 

I should add that it takes great leaders to structure teams (people) and work so that research and design efforts flow into and feed one another resulting in good design and rapid turnaround without sacrificing quality. This is truly a daunting task.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Chad:</p>
<p>I wholeheartedly agree that the term user-centered (user-centric, ugh) is reaching buzzword status. It&#8217;s becoming a feel-good word managers can throw around to gain credibility. I also agree that its practice is somewhat… &#8220;impoverished.&#8221; But this impoverishment is not due to the UCD methods themselves, or even the skill of those employing UCD (usually). In my experience, the problem is one of stakeholder expectations about the amount of research UCD involvement required to ship a good product.</p>
<p>In my experience, most stakeholders understand that good design requires some contact with real users, but there are always pressures to deliver products more rapidly and more cheaply. I like the old adage, of FAST, CHEAP, GOOD – pick two, you can&#8217;t have all three. I have seen UCD failures occur most frequently because the design team was not able to sell the stakeholders on performing adequate research to inform the design. In this scenario, some UCD is done, but not enough and so assumptions and guesses are made and the resulting design suffers, not because of UCD, but because of the lack of it. Meanwhile, the stakeholders will of course talk up how their product was usability tested, and what a difference it made, further watering down the notion of UCD.</p>
<p>It is up to us as designers and UCD practitioners to battle this – to make the case for more complete and holistic UCD activities in our projects and to take ownership of the whole user experience, not just the &#8220;usability&#8221; aspect. During the last couple of years, I have seen consideration of the &#8220;whole experience&#8221; really catching on. I try to think of my role as helping to make a product usable, useful, and desirable and I structure my work towards those ends. I harp on this &#8220;trinity&#8221; of design endlessly, and after awhile, people catch on. This approach can open doors to doing the kind of user research and UCD needed to gain those insights that lead to great products. </p>
<p>I should add that it takes great leaders to structure teams (people) and work so that research and design efforts flow into and feed one another resulting in good design and rapid turnaround without sacrificing quality. This is truly a daunting task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Info careers make the US News Top Job list for 2008 by HCNet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Profesiones con futuro</title>
		<link>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/83#comment-31835</link>
		<dc:creator>HCNet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Profesiones con futuro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/83#comment-31835</guid>
		<description>[...] en el blog de Andrew Dillon que U.S. News ha publicado un listado de las mejores profesiones (para el 2008). Estas cosas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] en el blog de Andrew Dillon que U.S. News ha publicado un listado de las mejores profesiones (para el 2008). Estas cosas [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Continuous partial attention syndrome by Ed Mitchell: Platform neutral &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Three types of facilitation</title>
		<link>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/49#comment-31294</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Mitchell: Platform neutral &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Three types of facilitation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/49#comment-31294</guid>
		<description>[...] phrase was coined describing this phenonenom: “Constant partial attention syndrome” (good slashdot discussion about it here). It is the reality. The centralised expectation of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] phrase was coined describing this phenonenom: “Constant partial attention syndrome” (good slashdot discussion about it here). It is the reality. The centralised expectation of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Third Force by Michael Curry</title>
		<link>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/39#comment-31250</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Curry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/39#comment-31250</guid>
		<description>I concur with your remarks and share your frustration, but &lt;a href="http://www.webmentors.com/mentorsblog.aspx?s=16" rel="nofollow"&gt;I have already
noted&lt;/a&gt;, the problem is equally challenging on the other side of thefence. After many years delivering eBusiness solutions I realize part of the issue is &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computational_complexity_theory rel="nofollow"&gt;intractability&lt;/a&gt;. Put simply, there are more problems then time and resources. So the free market has to help decide which getsolved and which are postponed to the next release. I often wish I could go back and start over but when faced with increasing the budget or coping with usability inconveniences, most clients prefer to get thesolution on time and within budget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with your remarks and share your frustration, but <a href="http://www.webmentors.com/mentorsblog.aspx?s=16" rel="nofollow">I have already<br />
noted</a>, the problem is equally challenging on the other side of thefence. After many years delivering eBusiness solutions I realize part of the issue is <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computational_complexity_theory rel="nofollow">intractability</a>. Put simply, there are more problems then time and resources. So the free market has to help decide which getsolved and which are postponed to the next release. I often wish I could go back and start over but when faced with increasing the budget or coping with usability inconveniences, most clients prefer to get thesolution on time and within budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Continuous partial attention syndrome by Ed Mitchell: Platform neutral &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Three types of community</title>
		<link>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/49#comment-25674</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Mitchell: Platform neutral &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Three types of community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/49#comment-25674</guid>
		<description>[...] to technology coming on in leaps and bounds, we live in an era of much distraction; the term &#8216;Continuous partial attention syndrome&#8216; was coined this year and has stuck. In light of this, the centralised model suffers as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to technology coming on in leaps and bounds, we live in an era of much distraction; the term &#8216;Continuous partial attention syndrome&#8216; was coined this year and has stuck. In light of this, the centralised model suffers as [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Computer science seeks sex appeal (part II) by Alex</title>
		<link>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/44#comment-23485</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sentra.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/blog/archives/44#comment-23485</guid>
		<description>Well, my sister has graduated in CS. Im Mechanical engineer and computer addict. Here in Slovenia CS is still mostly male dominated although it is not  in equal ratio like previous years. Be aware, ladies are on the way...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, my sister has graduated in CS. Im Mechanical engineer and computer addict. Here in Slovenia CS is still mostly male dominated although it is not  in equal ratio like previous years. Be aware, ladies are on the way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
